Unlike the books, The End of History and the Last Man, The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of the World Order, Kissinger's latest book World Order deals with the balance of power. In his own words, he analyses "how to build a shared international order in a world of divergent historical perspectives, violent conflict, proliferating technology, and ideological extremism". Francis Fukuyama, in his 1992 book (The End of History and the Last Man) argues that we are witnessing not just the end of the Cold War but the end of history which is the endpoint of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.1 Conversely, Samuel Huntington along with his the clash of civilizations thesis argues that the great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural and the principal conflicts will occur between nations and groups of different civilizations.
Discover the world's research
- 20+ million members
- 135+ million publications
- 700k+ research projects
Join for free
Vol. 5 • No: 1 • Spring 2015 Challenging conventional thinking in the Caucasus
The Role of Mobility and Border Security
in EU-Azerbaijan Relations:
How Far Can They Go?
Michela Ceccorulli
Azerbaijani Community of the Nagorno-
Karabakh Region: Quest for Peace,
Justice and Returning Home
Rovshan Rzayev
Forced Humanitarianism: Turkey's
Syrian Policy and the Refugee Issue
Ariel González Levaggi
Internal Displacement in Azerbaijan:
Its Causes and Consequences.
Tofig Musayev
A Life on the Edge: Syrian IDPs
Zümrüt Sönmez
Stranded and Trapped:
The Syrian Refugee Crisis in Turkey
and International Inaction
Constanze Letsch
On Azerbaijani Refugees and
IDPs from Armenia and
Nagorno-Karabakh
Colluquy with Chingiz Ganizade
The Crisis of Multiculturalism in the UK:
Has It Failed?
Namig Abbasov
Contemporary Refugee Issues in the EU
and the Crises of Multiculturalism
Brendan Cole
2014: The Year 10 Million Syrians
Became an Insignificant Statistic
Salwa Amor
Book Review
Henry Kissinger: World Order
Caucasus Under Review:
Recently Published Books
Immigration Policy
in Europe Amid
Multiculturalism Crisis
Arastu Habibbayli
Life in a Tent…
The Unending Plight of Syrian
Refugees in Lebanon
Samar el Kadi
Displacement, Refugees
and Migration
in the Caucasus and Eurasia
147
* The Book Review was prepared by Dr. Özgür Tüfekçi, Senior Editor of Caucasus International
Henry Kissinger
Book Review*
World Order
148
Caucasus International
Henry Kissinger
World Order
Penguin Press: New York, 2014, 432 pp.
Unlike the books, The End of History and the Last Man , The
Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of the World Order,
Kissinger's latest book World Order deals with the balance of
power. In his own words, he analyses "how to build a shared
international order in a world of divergent historical perspec-
tives, violent conict, proliferating technology, and ideological
ext remism".
Francis Fukuyama, in his 1992 book (The End of History and the
Last Man) argues that we are witnessing not just the end of the
Cold War but the end of history which is the end point of man-
kind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western
liberal democracy as the nal form of human government.1 Con-
versely, Samuel Huntington along with his the clash of civiliza-
tions thesis argues that the great divisions among humankind
and the dominating source of conict will be cultural and the
principal conicts will occur between nations and groups of dif-
ferent civilizations.2
In this sense, Henry Kissinger's book diverges from the afore-
mentioned books. Kissinger alleges that there has never been a
true "world order". According to him, for most of the human his-
tory, civilizations dened their own concepts of order and each
considered itself the center of the world. However, he claims
that the true "world order" requires civilizations to engage each
other. From his perspective, they are not destined to clash. On
the other hand, as a respond to Fukuyama's nal form of human
government thesis, Kissinger puts forward that "every region
participates in questions of high policy in every other, often in-
stantaneously. Yet, there is no consensus among the major actors
about the rules and limits guiding this process, or its ultimate
destination. The result is mounting tension".
1 Francis Fukuyama, "The End of History?", The National Interest, Summer 1989, [Accessed on
08.02.2015], <https://ps321.community.uaf.edu/les/2012/10/Fukuyama-End-of-history-article.pdf>
2 Samuel Huntington, "The Clash of Civilizations?", Foreign Affairs. February 2015, [Accessed
on 08.02.2015] <http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/48950/samuel-p-huntington/the-clash-of-
civilizations>.
149
Vol. 5 • No: 1 • Spring 2015
The book covers almost every corner of the world except Latin
America. Specically, it focuses on four different concepts of
"world order". The rst one is the European Balance-of-Power
system. In this concept, Kissinger makes attribution to the Peace
of Westphalia. According to him, "today the Westphalian con-
cepts are often maligned as a system of cynical power manipula-
tion, indifferent to moral claims. Yet the structure established in
the Peace of Westphalia represented the rst attempt to institu-
tionalize an international order on the basis of agreed rules and
limits and to base it on a multiplicity of powers rather than the
dominance of a single country" (p. 30).
The second concept is Islamic system. The book deals with the
Islamic world order from the Prophet Muhammad era to the
present time from the perspective of Islam's mission. Kissinger
argues that the Islamic world order was based on the mission to
incorporate dar al-harb (lands beyond the conquered regions)
into its own world order and thereby to bring universal peace.
The third concept is Asian balance of power understanding
which is examined from the three different perspectives (Japan,
India, and China). While Kissinger acknowledges that until the
arrival of the modern Western powers, no Asian language had a
word for "Asia", he also points out that the term "Asia" ascribes
a deceptive coherence to a disparate region. In this regard, he
emphasizes that the historical European order had been self-con-
tained although the contemporary Asian order includes outside
powers as an integral feature.
Kissinger's last world order concept is the American order. In
terms of this concept, he shares similar thoughts with Hillary
Clinton on the contemporary world order. While Clinton ex-
presses that the liberal international order that the United States
has worked for generations to build and defend seems to be un-
der pressure from every quarter3 , Kissinger puts forward that no
country has played such a decisive role in shaping contempo-
rary world order as the United States, nor professed such am-
bivalence about participation in it (p. 234).
All in all, expecting an impartial work from the 56th Secretary of
3 [Accessed on 08.02.2015], <http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clinton-reviews-
henry-kissingers-world-order/2014/09/04/b280c654-31ea-11e4-8f02-03c644b2d7d0_story.html>
150
Caucasus International
State would be naivety. If you do so, you would be awakened by
the rst paragraph of the book. The following paragraph leads
the reader to understand what this 432 pages book is about:
In 1961, as a young academic, I called on President Harry S.
Truman when I found myself in Kansas City delivering a speech.
To the question of what in his presidency had made him most
proud, Truman replied, "That we totally defeated our enemies
and then brought them back to the community of nations. I would
like to think that only America would have done this. (p. 1) "
In a nutshell, Kissinger guides readers through crucial episodes
of recent world history and analyses the different world order
concepts. However, the bottom line is that according to him, "In
China and Islam, political contests were fought for control of an
established framework of order. Dynasties changed, but each
new ruling group portrayed itself as restoring a legitimate sys-
tem that had fallen into disrepair. In Europe, no such evolution
took hold. With the end of Roman rule, pluralism became the
dening characteristic of the European order (p.11) … America
has, over its history, played a paradoxical role in world order:
it expanded across a continent in the name of Manifest Destiny
while abjuring any imperial designs; exerted a decisive inu-
ence on momentous events while disclaiming any motivation of
national interest; and became a superpower while disavowing
any intention to conduct power politics (p. 234)".
The previous paragraph would be count as the summation of
Kissinger's thinking. Apart from that, the book deals with the
existing problems instead of proposing solutions. In this sense,
it would be logical to claim that Kissinger, with his book, sug-
gests that the US should lead the "world order" by assuming he-
gemony as it is the only country which could perform this duty.
From this perspective, some would nd this book brilliant. Yet,
it should not be forgotten that it has been written by a National
Security Advisor and Secretary of State under Richard Nixon
and Gerald Ford and embrace a specic way of understanding
and thinking.
Overall, the book is lucid and attractive. It has a great deal to
recommend it but should be read with eyes wide open.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345360427_Book_Review_World_Order_by_Henry_Kissinger
Posted by: davedaveskagerberge0268737.blogspot.com
